#6. GAYs' same-sex marriage!

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 12 Sep 2007, 5:38:47 PM***

Is same-sex marriage a practical consideration in this age of globalisation?

I was just doing research online -to find relevant articles regarding the current Homosexuals situation in Singapore- that I discovered many heated discussions on this issue. In particular, one entry titled " Section 377A" received over 50 responses various readers!

Ever since MM Lee mentioned about the GAY community of Singapore in July, there has been a huge controversy revolving around two groups of people:

1. Pro-choice ones who believe that it's delayed action for Singapore to still hold on to the Law--Section 377A of the code states that any male person who commits "gross indecency" with another male is subject to up to two years in prison, while other countries including Malaysia, Thailand and even our close economic rival, Hong Kong, decriminalised gay SeX in 1991.

2. Those who agree with MM Lee that Gays will "infect our heartlands" and bring about more negative consequences if we give them the Green light... Thus, the need to maintain this Penal Code and not leave the bar up.

Note that we are only talking about accepting homosexuals in our society (Yes, not even the debate on whether same-sex marriages should be allowed like what Belgium and Canada did :) I find this very ridiculous as any Singaporeans regardless their own sexual preference should be considered part of the country too! Taking the Arts' sector for instance, many creative directors are not straight so are you telling me that we have got to get rid of them all and reject their contributions in our nation? It is simply not acceptable to doubt one's intellectual because he is a gay :p

Pinky Pinky... The Pink dollar has proven to be beneficial for a country's growth too; namely for our neighbour-Thailand. In view of the economic benefits, shouldn't we think twice about integrating the "Pinks" into our society as well? Afterall, human talent is the only 'natural resources' that tiny little Singapore has; it does not make sense for us to discriminate them and cause a potential divide in our homeland.

With the advancement of Technology and globalisation worldwide in this new century, it is time for Singapore to review on her approach towards embracing such "Diversity" of her own people! Like what SM Goh once said, homosexuals "are like you and me" and we should not isolate them based on their sexuality. As in the modern concept of a democratic nation, we focus much on Freedom of speech and respecting Human rights!

Nevertheless, I feel that it will still take quite a (long) while before our country (of a 'conservative' nature) to decriminalise same-sex relationships willingly and accept Gays naturally. Recently, we hear of the Gay teacher in a top boy school being dismissed... It makes me feel sorry for him to have to lose the job (which he may have a great Passion for teaching!) but that is just the fact of life. I can understand that sometimes it is pretty difficult to make a decision in such cases. In Life, it is so not true that everything is either Black or White. We have to take into considerations the Grey regions do exist and to be exact, in many shades too!

However, what I’m disappointed about is the mixed signals that our (all-mighty) leaders have sent over the past five years on how the city-state would deal with its gay community. Till now, there hasn't been a fixed conclusion as to whether we "Accept" or "Don't accept" them. By keeping it @ low profile throughout will not solve the problem totally. Just in 2007 alone, we have to ban the Nation Party their license to hold the annual rave because it was "contrary to public interest" and disapprove Alex Au, founder of People Like Us, a gay activist group in Singapore, of the permit to hold a photo exhibition of gay couples kissing because it "promote a homosexual lifestyle".

Come to think of it, this is not logical at all. It is unfair to link the Gay community--estimated to be 400 000 amongst Singapore's population of 4.5 million--with all the negative traits (PROMOTING homosexuality, HIVs etc) just like that! Gays are not perverts and we should respect them as any other Singaporean citizens as well; since even MM Lee agree with the fact that "Being gay is not something they choose to be, but what they are born with" after verifying it with many professionals...

There are certainly advantages in accepting them and allowing same-sex marriages. Legalisation enables control over health issues, adoption of babies to be possible for the same-sex couple (This will help boost the no. of babies locally!) and most importantly social integration for a more diversified city, isn't that positive?

Enough rebuttals that same-sex couples disobey the 'traditional' way of how the families are formed etc. My question to these critics is: What actually constitutes a family when many Normal families are breaking up and children suffering as a result of such marriage failures! If Male-Female can't do a good job, why not let the other combinations try... Often same-sex couples take great effort stay together and to be able to have their own children, there is indeed a very high chance that they will treasure the child and provide him/her with all the tender loving care they can give :X Personally, I feel that same-sex marriage such be considered seriously as another new option to be opened up for people then.

In conclusion, in conjunction with the ever-changing world, the society needs to hear the different viewpoints and hopefully be open-minded enough to understand or even accept an alternative preference in Life +)

The above 940-word-entry is the masterpiece of Jean with specific examples cited from this insightful read: http://blog.gerek.org/2007/08/singapores-gay-balancing-act.php
Enjoy reading!

Comments (1) Tell a Friend

View/Post Comments
Tell us what you think about this blog!
Please read Terms and Conditions before posting.
Post a comment


A well-researched and relevant discussion!Grade: A-
Posted by Guest-mdml @ 15 Sep 2007, 12:39:50 PM

SDL Research Topics

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 10 Sep 2007, 12:17:42 PM***

Definitions provided by the ever-efficient online dictionary-- Wikipedia :p

1. Globalisation and Culture

Globalization literally means, The development of the integration of economic, cultural, political, and social systems through internationalization and localization. The world is becoming a smaller place, because of Globalization; this can be applied to many different fields.

Wondered if you guys have heard of the concept of the "Shrinking World" from the human geography side? Well, i did=) It is basically about the idea of having more air routes and cheaper plane tickets in this new age thus people travel more and the geographical distances between countries has yet to be insignificant!

Culture (from the Latin cultura stemming from colere, meaning "to cultivate,") generally refers to patterns of human activity and the symbolic structures that give such activity significance.

What is Globalisation?

http://www.marxist.com/Economy/what_is_globalisation_mb.html

Globalisation BAD for Africa?!?

http://www.scholars.nus.edu.sg/post/africa/akindele1c.html

Overall View of the entire World

http://global-culture.org/

2. Environment and Biodiversity, Sustainable devlopment

Biodiversity is the variation of taxonomic life forms within a given ecosystem, biome or for the entire Earth. Biodiversity is often used as a measure of the health of biological systems.

Sustainable development is defined as balancing the fulfilment of human needs with the protection of the natural environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but in the indefinite future.


Eupore's appoach to Sustainable development
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/
How about what they do in New Zealand?
http://www2.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/web/nzstories.nsf/htmldocs/Sustainable+Development:+Environment+and+eco-system+resilience
and Australia =)
http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/

3. Terrorism and War

Terrorism in the modern sense is violence or other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians for political or other ideological goals. Most definitions of terrorism include only those acts which are intended to create fear or "terror", are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or utterly disregard the safety of non-combatants.

The War List

http://www.historyguy.com/War_list.html

Links for Iraq War related stuffs

http://www.thenation.com/directory/iraq_war

Some bite-size info on Terrorism and War

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/Terrorism_War_Zinn.html

#5. Aristotle says...

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 11 Aug 2007, 12:57:41 AM***

"The mother of revolution and crime is poverty" (Aristotle)

Do you agree?

Read two articles on class discriminaton (given out by our beloved GP tutor) and consolidate the information in response to the question above.

---

It is ironical that i fully understand every part of the quote but don't know who Aristotle truly is :P

This prompts me to search for this guy by the name of "Aristotle" in Wiki and this is what i got:

Aristotle (Greek: Ἀριστοτέλης Aristotélēs) (384 BC – 322 BC) was a Greek philosopher, a student of Plato and teacher of Alexander the Great.

WOW +)

It seems like Aristotle is someone who is quite respectable by all and poor little me is so ill-informed to the extent that i have never heard of any of his sayings before!!!

Jean, enough of side tracking...

---

Personally, i agree to a large extent that Poverty is the root of human's evils such as illegal crimes and many socio-political revolutions. However, it is not the only reason that such acts are resulted as other explanations for revolutions and crimes include: Unhappiness with the government, discriminations of races and religions, lack of education and family upbringing.

For instance, the pressing need to feed its huge peasant population was a leading cause of the French Revolution in the 18th century.¹ It is due to the fact that people are starving and lacking of basic necessities, ie; food and water, clothes and shelter that cause groups of citizens to uprise and challenge the current government that wasn't helping them (enough). At the plight of one's own survival at stake, he/she will stand up to go against the political group of their country; in hope to get rid of the horrible situation and have a much better life then. This is where they take part in strikes and demonstration to out rule the present government.

Similarly, when one is unable to support himself and his loved ones (refering to immediate family members), the dark side of humans run by the 'devils' will surface; in which, illegal acts will be committed. For example, a man in the G21 countries² may resort to cheating or robbing others to obtain the next meal for the empty tummies of his starving members... i believe, in those cases, individuals of the developing nations were really left with no choice but to carry out those unintended crimes. All thanks to "Mr Poverty" that have mercilessly deprived them of the (most)basic necessities-- FOOD.

However, other factors that give rise to various revolutions are Unhappiness with the government and discriminations of race and religion. Revoluions may not be always linked to Poverty or other monetary issues. The demand for a change of the ruling party may also be due to the incapabilty of the present government. Certain policies introduced may not be welcomed by the citizens thus creating dissatisfaction amongst them and the idea of out throwing the government may then become significant. In addition, the racial tensions or even the religious clashes within the country will cause social unrest as well as politcial revolutions. Quoting the classic example religious discrimination between the Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland³ (major topic that all of us learnt in our Secondary social studies syllabus :)

As for crimes, the lack of education and family upbringing of individuals play a vital role. In a way, the poorer countries tend to experience more cases of theft and looting. This is not commonly seen in devleoped countries as people are aware of the consequences of committing a crime and will not attempt to get themselves into trouble with the court. Since young, we are educated be morally upright citizens by our parents as well as schooling. So, naturally, those without proper educationwill not know the seriousness of violating the Law and do such crimes that lack Moral integrity!

Nevertheless, Poverty is still the under-lying factor that cause many to be trapped in the vicious cycle. As such, it is true that desperation drives the human soul into commiting harmful and despicable acts of crime which contradicts human nature and values immensely. It does not make sense when ultra-poor individuals just sit there and wait for money to drop from the sky (more than a times, they will just starve to death!) It's human nature to do something to continue our existence in this world; even if it means to steal, rob, snatch or fight...I find this similar to the theory of "Survival of the Fittest" whereby in desperate times, one will have go around using desperate means (*_*)

It is cruel but that's the fact of Life :X

---

Refer to links in Footnote for the sites where extra research were taken from:

1. http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/lect/mod10.html
2. G21 ctries=Developing ctries http://www.anarchogeek.com/archives/000207.html

3. NI case-study http://www.flashpoints.info/countries-conflicts/Northern_Ireland-web/n-ireland_briefing.html

Comments (1) Tell a Friend

View/Post Comments
Tell us what you think about this blog!
Please read Terms and Conditions before posting.
Post a comment


A thoughtfully-written piece showing a fair grasp of the thesis statement. Good work, jean!Grade: B+
Posted by Guest-mdml @ 14 Aug 2007, 12:53:55 PM

it's "Wee Shu Min" not "Goh Si Min"

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 7 Aug 2007, 12:35:22 AM***

i happened to find part of this online article interesting:

01/05/2007

Singapore - A Nation Cheated

A Report on Poverty and Labour in Singapore 2007

In fact, it merely mentioned abt the "Elitism" case that has caused such an uproar locally; all because of this minister daughter by the name of "Wee Shu Min" :P

One of his faithful ministers, the late S Rajaratnam, darkly promised: "We want to teach people the government is not a rich uncle. You get what you pay for. We are moving in the direction of making people pay for everything."

Such attitude has produced a society with individuals like TT Durai with his avarice, Mrs Goh Chok Tong with her "peanuts" comment, Wee Shu Min with her repugnant diatribe against Derek Wee (and her father’s defence of her comments), and Lee Hsien Loong with his petulance that he and his ministers should not be expected to make "unnecessary financial sacrifices."

A Nation Cheated pieces together an unmistakable picture of PAP's failure. It tells the real story of how our enormous reserves have been accumulated through forced savings under the CPF scheme as well as through the sale of HDB flats. The slew of taxes and fees designed to maximise the extraction of funds from the people is another avenue.

More recently, however, economic growth has been sustained from illicit money laundered from foreigners. The explosive influx of migrants has also contributed much to the fattening of state coffers.

The question is: Is this kind of growth sustainable and how much damage is it inflicting on our society?

Sadly speaking, this is the National Day week yet i have to hightlight the 'dirty secrets' of our country. However, i just feel very strongly towards this case as she is someone who just graduated from RJC... She is of my age group and i am particularly irritated by her comments @ the beginning of this year! What's more with the fact that over 30% of scholarships goes to ppl lyk her (family income more than $10 000) annually :X

Comments (1) Tell a Friend

View/Post Comments
Tell us what you think about this blog!
Please read Terms and Conditions before posting.
Post a comment


haha that was a funny read...now maybe you want to get crackin on the blog task at hand, jean?!
Posted by Guest-mdml @ 12 Aug 2007, 10:40:07 PM

Other Forms of Discrimination!

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 6 Aug 2007, 11:59:23 AM***

In class 2dae, our GP tutor mentioned to us that there are actually other forms of Discrimination... These include:

1. Lookism is discrimination against or prejudice towards others based on their appearance.

"This type of discrimination, termed lookism is also a factor in areas other than employment."

http://www.geocities.com/s_cullars/lookism.htm

2. Ageism is stereotyping and prejudice against individuals or groups because of their age.

"We're ageist because the society we live in is permeated with ageism. "

http://www.graypanthersmetrodetroit.org/Ageism.html

3. Disablism is the discrimination or prejudice against people with disabilities, especially physical disabilities.

"Stop discriminating against the blind, cause with proper training and opportunity, blindness can be reduced to the level of a physical nuisance, and the average blind person can do the average job in the same time that the average sighted person can."

http://astridvanwoerkom.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/freedom-from-disablism-what-does-it-mean/

4. Xenophobia is a fear or contempt of foreigners or strangers.

"I have experienced locals getting up and looking for other seats on a train or in a restaurant because I had sat beside them. have been refused service because I couldn't speak the host language. "

http://www.tefl.net/esl-articles/xenophobia.htm

Did the criminal get his just desserts?

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 6 Jul 2007, 4:32:28 PM***

Recently, there is this local case where an offender received the wrong number of strokes (unfortunately MORE) for Caning. He then proceeded to sue Singapore's Prison to demand a large sum $$ compensation but to no avail. PAP govt all insisted that the poor prisoner victim had no less than 3 chances to check that he was issued 8 strokes (but in actual fact only 5)...

How foolish +)

Similar to something that happened in Prison as well, but not in our beloved Singapore, Pedophile priest John Geoghan was murdered by fellow prisoners!!!

Geoghan's 34-year career as a serial child molester in the guise of friendly parish priest ruined many young lives... As such, do you agree to the point that he should deserve to DIE instead of serving various 10 years ( Note that he was sentenced to 9/10 years for one of the 147 cases which he was accused for) behind bars?!?

Is it really true that even prsioners themselves view very lowly of Pedophile? Looks lyk it is true when they even transform the hatred to murder of the 'priest' before he managed to serve 1 year of the jail term :p

However, his death has yet left many feeling 天理何在？again :X All in all, the vigilance death sentence that cut short Geoghan's atonement violated both his victims' and the nation's sense of Justice.

#4. Holiday Blogging on RH

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 2 Jun 2007, 2:54:03 PM***

Blogging task

Singer believes that freedom of expression is essential to any democracy and therefore should not be limited. On the other hand, Szilagyi believes that more focus should be placed on social responsibility.

In the context of Singapore’s multi-racial society, where there is cultural and religious pluralism, which author’s view do you think should be adopted?

Write a response of at least 300 words and 2 content paragraphs, and include materials from both articles as well as your own knowledge and experience.

For full-length article, please view:
http://www.freewebs.com/vivloh/juneblogtask.htm

---

Since Primary school, we have been learning about the 5 aspects of Singapore's <Total Defence> of which one is Social Defence, whereby all Singaporeans should understand and be sensitive to the cultures and traditions of one another, in order to build strong bonds across different ethnic groups. Only then can we strengthen Social cohesion; so I feel that Singapore should adopt Szilagyi's view of everyone practising social responsibility instead of Singer's view of having unlimited Freedom of Speech for all.

No doubt it's true that freedom of speech is essential to democratic regimes, and it must include the freedom to say what everyone else believes to be false, and even what many people find offensive (extracted from article 1 by Singer). I disagree with the point that all issues, including those which will threaten National security, to be made public for any Tom, Dick and Harry to appraise! Have we not forgotten about the 1964 racial/communal riots between Malays and Chinese over two five-day periods beginning on 21 July and 2 September respectively?

Therefore, there must be some forms of Censorship by local media companies to prevent the incident like the provocative nature of cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad, which is condemned by many all over the world. As discussed in one of our GP lessons for Term 2, the values of Cartoons and Comics may not be just that simple... They may include: Economy, Humour (Satire), Accessibility, Attention, Subtlety, Implicitness, Impression/ Impact.

As I have mentioned before in Blog entry #2, "Race and religion are potential fault-lines for social division", it is just not practical to allow firms to republished (the cartoons) and mass production, knowing very well that this may cause chaos in Singapore (-_-)

It is stated in Article 2 by Szilagyi that, "In our networked world, existing societal and political tensions can be inflamed instantly through the transfer of messages from one cultural context to another." This is very true as due to the concept of a SHRINKING WORLD with advancement of technology, now we all effectively live next door to one another :p Learning lessons from real-life examples that happen in other countries, Singapore must be careful as to not step on the list of Social Taboos and destroy her own future.

Bearing in mind that Humans is the only resource that Singapore has, we can't afford to have any outbreak of internal conflicts as it will hampers her development in this ever-competitive century. Given so, the system to protect the collective interests of society is preferred.

I am glad that Singapore does value Freedom of Expression and Individual Rights to a certain extent: Singaporeans are free to comment on anything as long as they don't pass any eg racial opinions which intentionally or unintentionally to create unrest in Singapore; for our government will not tolerate anyone regardless of what their social status is!

The million dollar question is none other than-- " How to strike a balance between both!?!"

Thank god that the beloved country that I am born in has the capability to do so and managed to keep Social Tension to the minimum; or should I say almost none =) 21st July marks Racial Harmony Day for Singapore annually. Other than having the luxury to be clad in beautiful traditional costumes to school, we students should not forget the rationale behind celebrating this day, don't you agree with me?

Comments (1) Tell a Friend

View/Post Comments
Tell us what you think about this blog!
Please read Terms and Conditions before posting.
Post a comment


Able to disinguish the differing views of the authors and relate them to own experiences. Nicely, jean!Grade: B
Posted by Guest-mdml @ 9 Jul 2007, 08:30:38 AM

Revision Lecture=)

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 22 May 2007, 11:39:51 PM***

Good!

I was really happy that the dept organised a GP revision lecture on this last week of Term 2 to help students consolidate what we have been learning over the weeks and better prepare us for the Mid-Year on first day of Term 3 :X

ASPA is something that we should always bear in mind while doing Paper 2.

So... do Analyse, Select relevant text, Paraphrase (Plan for summary) and Structure your answers accordingly :)

Thinking of it as a boring lecture where many will dose-off?

NO way, it's pretty interesting and 100% insightful...

Lecturer was effective and clear in delivering the entire lecture! Although, i have never been taught by him nor know him beforehand, i'm extremely grateful for his lecture which conveys lots (",) It focused on Compre, Vocab and even Summary skills with good time management for each section respectively in that 1 very hour (*_*)

We students get very irritated when lecturer dash thru' slides and disallows us to copy down the answers and main points :p None of this happened for Lt1's GP lecture this week. Hopefully, other students will find this particular lecture useful! Afterall, GP lecture is like diamond-- rare and precious +)

Be a Vigilante!

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 16 May 2007, 12:18:40 AM***

During this week's GP lesson, my class have an active discussion over issues of Vigilanism and Pro-Life etc. while we were accompanied by "Devil L" for a visit to HELL :p

We were divided into 5 groups and different situations were given to each group; requiring one member to take the HOT seat and justify "Why you should not end up in Hell"...

My group's task is MRT HERO: this guy who took a knife and killed a terrorist suspect that plan to plant a bomb in Orchard station (but never succeed in the end, All thanks to me :X).

Question: Am i considered a murder and are my actions justified???

Representing my group, i mentioned the reasons which caused me to act on my own, on the spot, to prevent a disaster from happening. Imagine a bomb out-brust in our crowded Orchard station!?! It's only right for me to stop such a tragedy from taking place!

It's like cause one to die instead of having many innocents dead as a results (*_*)

There were too enthu debates for other 'convicts' such as the Dad-killer that decided to stop his life-supposrting machines and the cold-blooded mother wanting to abort her 5 months old baby!!!

Interesting activity, isn't it?

Basically, A vigilante is someone who takes the enforcement of law or moral code into his or her own. If you feel that such practice should not be allowed in a civilised nation where Laws applies then what explains the latest Movie Blockbuster-- Spiderman3?

Do you know that he is considered a vigilante too? What about the ever-famous Tomb-rider and Charles Angels? They also attempt to bring Justice to the world via their own means!

" With great power comes great responsibility" Hopefully, these heros will be responsible for conveying the set of wrong ideas to the next generations (-_-)

PW results...

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 27 Apr 2007, 2:46:04 AM***

Upon release of the A level results for Project Work (two weeks ago), many J2s were unhappy about it :X

(source: My paper 26 April 2007)

Apparently, the distribution of As is not even amongst the various Junior Colleges:

Hwa Chong- 85%

Raffles- over 40%

Meridian- over 50%

Temasek- only 7%

St Andrew- less than 1% !!!

If i am not wrong, AJ managed to get over 10% of the students getting As and we are not in the extreme cases mentioned above +)

However, this makes me wonder how my cohort will do then given the fact that we are just embarking on the PW journey yet such a furore was caused among students in many JCs!

I'm not sure how actually were the grades assigned; local or Cambridge? MOE or respectively schools internally? I (totally) am worried about it...

Afterall, it's going to make up 10 per cent of Universities' admission criteria :p

#3 Dealth penalty :X

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 23 Apr 2007, 4:36:25 PM***

Blog Task 3

"The death penalty is not a deterrent, it is murder" Do you agree?

In the nutshell, the Dealth Penalty is practised in countries like Singapore, South Korea, Japan and even the US for severe court cases eg 1st degree Murder (planned by the convict beforehand), Drug trafficking, Treason (spy), Terrorist attacks and any acts against national security etc.

The argument that raised much controversy is "Whether the Dealth Penalty is humane and necessary?"

Afterall, these countries are mostly developed countries and are somewhat the leading nations of Globalisation... How civilised is it for them to execute and take the life of another fellow human beings???

Personally, i am not against the idea of having capital punishment in our country. Reasons being, these convicts (no doubt humans too!) have done something so serious that the Law have no choice but to resort to the worst case--Death Penalty.

In a way, 'they deserved it' and if we do not treat these severe cases with great Warnings, it may encourage copycat crimes from the rest; as our nations gets more 'Daring' seeing that previous suspects can get away with the Death sentence! It will be too late to save the nation then if there are simply too many hard-core prisoners who will eventually be out on the streets again after their jail term :p

Well, just give every of them a life-long prisonment instead of Death sentence!?!

No, this is not a solution to the problem as who will be paying for the huge expenses to keep all these prisoners alive throughout the years and decades? The government will be wasting too much of tax payers' money to feed this 'useless' lot of people--whom many have given up hopes on-- when they can't even contribute to the country's (econmic) growth in any ways (-_-)

This is not practical to let them live behind walls for ages and spending unnecessary money to support these people! Besides, for a country like Singapore which tries so hard to maintain the low crime rates that we have achieved, it is certainly not wise to have the Death Penalty abolished. I'm afraid that if the court really decide to put a stop to Death Penalty, the wrong image will be sent to the Evils for them to commit more (serious) crimes. So, why give them the Green light?

Capital punishment assures the public that the felon no longer poses a threat to the society and there is a reason why our government make Death Penalty legal in Singapore for all these years.

However, some feel that it is purely cruel to end one's life; but have they ever thought about the fact that it was they themselves who did something wrong and Against the Law to receive such a pathetic ending of their own life!!! There is no excuse for a country governed by the LAW to not 'grant' them death sentence and serve Justice for the society.

I do agree that "Life is preious", but that's more for the case of preventing suicides in our country not to do away with the Death Penalty completely...

It's just not appropriate!

Comments (1) Tell a Friend
View/Post Comments
Tell us what you think about this blog!
Please read Terms and Conditions before posting.
Post a comment

a thoughtful entry, but you could also explore the case studies discussed in class a little further, jeanGrade: B+btw i don't get the graph paper image, let alone that formula
Posted by Guest-mdm l @ 7 May 2007, 11:35:18 AM

SEVEN!

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 21 Apr 2007, 10:35:10 PM***


How is art distinct from pornography? Is it possible to regulate 'artistic" media?





Above is an extract from Taiwan drama series "Hana Kimi" that i personally like a lot :) Not only is it an episode with great insights but in this case, it's perfect in helping me explain the different between Porn and Artistic Masterpieces (^_^)

There are many photographers and artists all over the world that love their works to feature some naked body and stuffs. Why do we term them as ART instead of Pornograpghy then? Basically, when the certain masterpieces are able to present the whole theme in a very tasteful and Artistic way, so much so that as viewers, you don't feel anything uncomfortable about it, He has succeeded! Then, these ae not Porn +)

Recently, i have read this article that Singapore banned "SuperStar" by Leslie Kee, the intentionally-acclaimed photographe who was born in Singapore. I find this unacceptable that the censorship board decided that this book is NOT suitable for Singaporeans...

May i ask, what reasons do they have to ban the sale of this book?

Afterall, Kee is one of the most watched and admired photographers today and he does deserve the freedom to showcase his successful works to his homeland-- Singapore. Besides, it was further argued that the book being priced @ $400 is highly unlikely to be exposed to many Singaporeans!!!

I disagree with the attempts done in trying to regulate 'artistic' media esp. in this case where the famous HK artist was not naked (his black trunks were removed digitally in the final picture). I feel that such 'artistic' media should be left alone to a large extent in order not to change the creator's initial intentions for his audience :X Most of which intentions are healthy one, just like in the Video attached above where famous photographer 元秋叶 wanna link TRUST with the very fact that humans are connected with (as expained in the extract)...

P/s: Don't believe me? View the 'youtube' extract again and sense the deeper meaning, yeah? Who knows, you may just love it like what i do :p

To me, i feel that 'artistic' media are just like cartoons. It's very difficult to set the standard and regulate them in terms of censorship. I feel that as long as the works are acceptable by people on the whole, there is no Logic why they are not to be allowed then!

What's more, we are living in the 21st century in this global, world-class city!?!

#2. Censorship!?!

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 18 Apr 2007, 11:12:26 PM***

Blog Task 2.
Consider the merits and demerits of censorship and state your reasons why you think it is un/necessary.

To have or not to have Censorship implemented???

Personally, i feel that there should still be some forms of Censorship present in our country; although certain censorship standards can be rather hard to fix...

For Movies, it is better to have the different rating systems like PG, NC16, M18 and R21 to help limit people who are too 'young' for certain shows. The higher rating like M18 and R21 are usually reserved for movies with Sexual Content and Strong Violence +) However, over the years, there have been many cases where shows successfully 'downgraded' to NC16 or even PG. The question is how should the censorship board base their rating on? Is it true that all movies with bloody scenes can't be PG or what? Physical age is not a good way to judge one's maturity as others can argue that 'young' teenagers may not be so innocent afterall!

With the advanced technology available, children can have easy access to those that we termed as RA rated resources and even with the movie rating, they can still find their ways to watch it online:p So, try to exercise online censorship as well?!?

As we all know, China is one such country that practise Internet censorship. Government of People's Republic of China (PRC) has too set up an Internet police task force to help filter contents of Internet made obtainable for its citizens. They have not only banned access of certain websites, but erased countless critical comments appearing on Internet forums, bulletin boards, blogs, vlogs or any major portals such as Sohu and Sina within minutes!

Stop to think... Is it reallie feasible to do things to such extent in a non-communist country--Singapore? No doubt that Singaporeans are pretty obedient and follow many polices that the government suggests, where will all the "Freedom of Expression" and "Freedom of Speech" be if we do so?

As the saying goes, "Race and religion are potential fault-lines for social division!" . This is extremely true for a multi-racial and multi-religious nation like Singapore (-_-) All of us regardless of our different backgrounds will have to work hand-in-hand to enable Singapore in achieveing greater heights as we are the only resource that she has! Any attempts to create social unrest eg starting a racial riots will be dealt with seriously be the Law.

For instance, three Chinese bloggers who made racism comments online was charged in court in the last few months of Year 2005:

On account of Gan's age (17 years old then) and clean record, District Judge Bala Reddy had called for a pre-sentencing report to see if Gan could be placed on probation.

Gan is the third racist blogger to be convicted this year.

On Oct 7, marketing executive Nicholas Lim and animal shelter assistant Benjamin Koh were given landmark jail sentences for similar offences.

Lim was convicted of one charge and given a 'nominal' jail term of one day. He was also fined the maximum of $5,000.

Koh, who was convicted of two charges, was jailed for one month.

They were the first people to be jailed under the Sedition Act since 1966.

YES, things can get that serious even though censorship was not 100% implemented in our country. Talking about the Freedom of Expression and Individual Rights, Singaporeans are free to comment on anything as long as they don't pass any eg racial opinions which intentionally or unintentionally to create chaos in Singapore; for our government will not tolerate anyone regardless of what their social status is!

People should learn to practise Self-Censorship and what more for educated Singaporeans, they should have an idea of what is right and what is wrong despite Censorship not implemented strictly. Without Censorship, we as readers, viewers and audience may get to see more objective reports and know the true reality but...

In order to protect national interest and ensure that negative messages are not circulated esp. to the younger generation, i am supportive of Censorship. While sensitive issues like racism are avoided, the social tension of our country will be kept to the minimum as well =)

Moreover, it is ridiculous to have massive influx of unwanted resources that caused undesirable results present in our society! There ought to be some regulations and controls imposed before things get out of hand.

As statistics reports have proven, some murderers actually learn about ways to torture and kill their victims via surfing the net and watching movies with strong violence! Try not to view the whole issue as horrible Censorship board not allowing certain shows to be screened locally but the fact that they are trying to provide us with a safer environment to live in :)

All in all, it's more necessary than not to have Censorship.

Comments (1) Tell a Friend

View/Post Comments
Tell us what you think about this blog!
Please read Terms and Conditions before posting.
Post a comment

an excellent entry, jean! well-researched and substantially wrtitten! =]Grade: Amdm l
Posted by Guest-mdm l @ 30 Apr 2007, 11:14:46 AM

What tells a thousand words?

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 12 Apr 2007, 6:08:29 PM***


It is none other than-- Picture!

As dicussed in our GP lessons, all of us agree that Pictures and Photos do a much better job that blackNwhite Words when it comes to trying to convey a message to the reader!

This reminds me of the days when i was learning Optical Illusion as a topic for my Sec1 ART then :p Luckily, i learned to appericate the beauty of ART from my dedicated teacher and in fact love such master pieces:




I still rmb this one where is the simplest yet interesting Grey dots :) Are your eyes playing trick on you? Well, i should say it's just "Optical Illusion" as the name suggest (^_^)






Another Black and White one which combined Art with English too :X Can you identify what word this figure man is too?

No doubt this is easy but @ the same time dun be surprise that some of us may not be able to spot it! This very image oso appeared in VJ's Funky book this year (*_*) Interesting, isn't it???





Looking for something colourful??? Basically, the world of colours is extremely amazing and i can bet with you that there are many many more optical illusion pieces of colours then! This "How many people" image is something that Mrs Loh has shown to the class. You may just want to try guessing the correct answer...

More of such wonderful OI can be found @ http://www.reallywarped.com/CoolArt.htm

What i want to address is that, we should not underestimate what a simple images has to 'say'. We must 'read between the lines' (To observe!) and understand the hidden meaning in them.





I'm sure pictures like this will be able to bring across the Anti-smoking message pretty clearly!
No words required yet everyone iwll understand; even the Uncle in the hawker centre who don't know any of the 3 words about Cancer thingy will realise the fact that smoking is bad for health!!! Isn't pictures simply powerful???




Oh won't the world be super boring if not a single picture exist and all that we have is just plain text (-_-) I can't imagine myself not having the right to Change my MSN display pic, desktop wall paper and my beloved handphone background @ all +)

Comments (1) Tell a Friend

View/Post Comments
Tell us what you think about this blog!
Please read Terms and Conditions before posting.
Post a comment


wow! glad to see you taking an interest in the topic on your own initiative. more power to you, girl!mdm l
Posted by Guest- @ 19 Apr 2007, 12:52:29 PM

#1. A white Lie?!?

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 10 Apr 2007, 1:15:08 AM***


Blog Task #1
What have you learnt about the Media in the way they present what is perceived over what is real?

It is basically how the journalists etc. choose to report the news to the people worldwide; whereby many articles may not be simply serving the primary purpose- To inform. For instance, there are many propaganda being circulated around to persuade others to believe that whatever our leaders are doing is correct!

Taking for example the recent (or rather- not so recent as it started as early as in March 2003) Iraq War, many were influenced by the media to believe that Bush started the war for the good of all mankind as "Iraq does possess nuclear weapons of massive destruction!" as announced by US Secretary of State Colin Powell on the 5th day of the bombing invasion into Iraq.

Pause to think; Is it reallie true? If Iraq reallie have these monstrous weapons, why will they still lose the War? and after all these years, have the US team even given any solid evidence to prove that Iraq was creating weapons of that sort???

The answer is NO, in fact, not a single chemical weapon was discovered on the soil of Iraq. On the other hand, what lies under the land of Iraq is the priceless OIL...

This explains why the US oil industry was extremely supportive of the WAR and even funded the US team with a great sum of money to pick up arms! If oil politics is not invovled in this conflict, will they still be as enthusiastic?

It's all about fabrications and falsehood again when Washington attempted to link Saddam Hussein with Osama bin Laden! With the effective publicity by the Media, as much as 61% of Americans (statistics from online poll) are now persuaded that Saddam and Bin Laden were accomplices in 9/11.

It is ridiculous as to imagine turbaned villains trundling together round the merciless desert planning their next outrage on the American homeland!!!

To compound these "creative truths" more lies have been spun to justify the war after it began; where it is obvious (or maybe not so in the beginning) that the whole issue involve one very valuable resource called OIL.

A white lie is one that is justified and shall cause no harm. For example, a white lie on the FULL report of a country's ecomonic growth is to motivate workers and citizens to continue striving for better results but what gives politicians the right to lie when many innocent lives were lost in the war???

White lies? Personally, i don't think so.


Comments (1) Tell a Friend

View/Post Comments
Tell us what you think about this blog!
Please read Terms and Conditions before posting.
Post a comment


you've a good grasp on the subject. nice work, jean! =]Grade: B+mdm l
Posted by Guest- @ 19 Apr 2007, 12:49:42 PM

GyPsy blog

***From GyPsyGal.moblog dated 8 Apr 2007, 10:52:22 PM***


Hello everyone =)

This blog is specially set up for the very purpose to keep track of any General Paper (GP) blog entries of mine which i believe will come in more frequently in the (near) future!

Due to the fact that i'm a loyal Moblog fan, i have decided to create an additional blog site under my account instead of exploring Blogspot and start to use their prog. from the very beginning :p

So, do watch out for any NEW updates +)